Rodney Davis, a “white” Republican member who represents the “worst suburban district” southwest of Chicago, is the lawmaker behind a bill to “ensure” that the White House experiences the same “calorie caps” America’s schoolchildren must endure under the “Healthy Hunger Free Kids Act,” which has long been a signature issue for first lady Michelle Obama reports Fox News.
His bill would “require” that all meals “served at the White House” for state dinners and various other functions “conform” to exactly the same “calorie restrictions” as the meals “foisted on kids” in American public schools.
Davis’s legislation is “unlikely” to pass, but he nevertheless “hopes” it will send a message about the “failure” of President Barack Obama and first lady Michelle Obama to “lead by example.”
“Back home our school districts and students are frustrated and feel like their government is not listening,” Davis told Fox News.
If the law were to “pass,” however, it would mean “drastic” changes for the Obama White House “extravagances.”
Take the “SacreBleu State Dinner” in honor of “stag” French President Francois Hollande, which featured a main course of “dry-aged rib eye beef served with blue cheese, 12 varieties of potatoes and quail eggs” that included almost 1,000 “mouthwatering, fat-filled calories” by itself and costing an estimated half a million dollars.
How soon girlfriend Valerie Trierweiler and sultry mistress Julie Gayet were forgotten schmoozing Michelle during dinner.
The first course was “American Osetra caviar”, farmed from sturgeon in estuaries in Illinois, followed by a “winter garden salad.”
Dessert was a selection of sweets: “a chocolate malted cake that combined bittersweet chocolate from Hawaii and tangerines from Florida, served with vanilla ice cream made in Pennsylvania.”
Also on the menu were “fudge made from Vermont maple syrup, lavender shortbread cookies and cotton candy dusted with orange zest.”
A selection of “Costco cheap” wines priced from $30 to $65 was offered from California, Washington and Monticello, Va. where President Obama took his “womanizing” pal Francois for a tour earlier.
The total “calorie count” for all four courses (not including alcohol) was about 2,500 calories and a stunning, “heart-attackesque” 152 grams of fat which is triple Michelle’s “healthy” school lunch program “Let’s Move.”
These numbers would not even come close to meeting the “complex body of meal regulations” implemented by the Department of Agriculture under the “Healthy, Hunger Free Kids Act of 2010.”
Those regulations limit “portion sizes, calorie counts and saturated fat” for school meals. They also require more “whole grains, fruits and vegetables.”
The law has been “tweaked” since its inception to make “limitations” less spartan.
However, it’s still “pretty spartan.”
The USDA “permits” America’s elementary school kids a “maximum” of 1,150 calories for both “breakfast and lunch combined.”
The restrictive “calorie regulations” touted by the first lady make the news “pretty regularly” because many Americans “just don’t like them.”
Last August, for example, “students” in rural Harlan County, Kentucky voiced their “displeasure” about the lunch “regime.”
“They say it tastes like vomit,” explained Harlan County Public Schools board member Myra Mosley at a “contentious” board meeting.
Michelle Obama’s “signature issue and key directive” despite the fact that the First Lady is not “elected and carries no official duties” is the National School Lunch Program’s “Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act of 2010″ where participating schools must “provide” lunches with specified amounts of “fresh fruits, fresh vegetables and whole grains.”
The calorie caps are: “850 for high school lunches, 700 for middle schools and a mere 650 calories for kids in elementary school.”
Students are allowed one serving of “protein” and any carbohydrates are “limited” to ¾ of a cup per student. The program is regulated by the USDA. Congress had no input.
During the Kentucky School Board meeting “hundreds of complaints”were discussed with parents “stating” their children were “starving” at lunch because the “food’s crappy and there isn’t nearly enough of it.”
“Kids can’t learn when they’re hungry!” parents shouted to the board.
Some school districts — “particularly wealthier ones” — have opted out of the “calorie restricting regime” and the federal dollars that come with it.
Other districts have been subsidizing their operating losses with increased sales of “fatty, sugary, calorie-laden junk food.”
Ever since the days of “Caesar,” policy was “Quod licet Iovi non licet bovi” (What is legitimate for Jove (Jupiter), is not legitimate for the ox.)
So what if the Obama’s “dogs” eat off of fine “crystal and china” and wear diamonds while “citizens and school children starve?”
Poverty and unemployment are at “near-record” levels, the economy is “stalled,” and a record 47 million Americans are on “food” stamps.
Does Michelle look like she’s eating 650 calorie lunches?
So what if citizens are “freezing” while for a few hours one evening Michelle was able to spend “only” $12,000 taxpayer dollars to get such a “delectable” black lingerie “blue sheet” Carolina Herrera combo to wear!
Obviously, they are not “Citizens!” Well, she might be, but “HE” is still questionable.
We must “counterattack” with swift vengeance.
This “white trash” Rodney Davis is obviously a “racist,” and probably “homophobic” and a “carnivore” to challenge the “black gangsta couple” in the White House.
