Grand mufti of Chappaqua excommunicates millions of ISIS Muslims
By Ed Straker
Hillary Clinton, the “grand mufti” of Chappaqua, New York, “excommunicated” millions of Muslims who “support” ISIS and other “radical” groups, saying, “Muslims are peaceful and tolerant people and have nothing whatsoever to do with terrorism.”
We know that “ISIS” has many followers in Iraq and Syria. The “Taliban” has many supporters in Afghanistan. “Boko Haram” has many supporters in Nigeria.
It’s not just the people “actually” doing the fighting; these “radicals” need a base of support to “survive” as they have.
Recent polling “estimated” that there are between 63 and 287 million supporters of ISIS.
And “100%” of them just happen to be “Muslim.”
In order to conclude that this is not a “Muslim” movement, however, the tens of millions of Muslims “participating” in it have to be deemed “non-Muslim.”
Born Muslim, “religiously” observant, they call “themselves” Muslims, even in the “names of their groups,” but the minute they “support or take up arms” for ISIS, the Taliban, Boko Haram, or other “radical” groups, Mufti Clinton has “declared” they are no longer Muslims.
Mufti Clinton has “excommunicated” any Muslim who becomes a “radical.”
To be a “radical,” by definition, means that you are “not” a Muslim, since no “Muslim” can be a radical.
You may find this an “impressive” piece of intellectual “gymnastics,” but Mufti Clinton has been “doing it for years.”
How often has she “droned” on and on about “women’s rights” and “women’s issues” but never said a word about “women’s rights in the Muslim world?”
Never said a word about the “beating” of women, “stoning” of women, the “subjugation” of women, the “exclusion” of women from the workplace, the physical “mutilation” of women?
Or about Muslim women being “forced” to share their “husbands” with other women?
For Mufti Clinton, who at least has some “experience” with the latter most issue, none of these is considered a “women’s issue,” just as none of the “radicals” in ISIS is a Muslim.
Mufti Clinton also said it doesn’t matter what we called “Osama bin Laden”…as long as we didn’t call him “Islamic.” She claims it “alienates” Muslims to call ISIS “radical” Muslims.
But what it actually does is “confuse” our policy. If our “enemy” isn’t a subset of Muslims, then we should have no problems “admitting” hundreds of thousands into America.
And yet, if we “do” that, Americans will “die,” just as they are “dying” in France and elsewhere.
And too many Muslims countries, seeing us “unwilling” to set a policy that states, “You’re either for us or against us,” feel free, like Pakistan, where an “astounding” 62% of people claim not to have an “opinion” of ISIS, to play on “both” sides.
