If you “#StandwithAhmed,” the little Muslim wannabe “bomb maker” from Texas, you are a “traitor.”
Apparently, that group “includes” Barack Hussein Obama and Mark Elliot Zuckerberg.
Little Ahmed, the so-called Muslim “boy” genius, didn’t invent or even build anything. He took apart an “existing” clock, and transplanted the “guts” into a pencil box, and claimed it was his “own” creation.
The “hubbub” surrounding Irving, Texas 14-year-old MacArthur High School student Ahmed Mohammed, the kid who brought a homemade “briefcase clock” that looked like a “fake bomb” to school, continues apace, with the President of the United States “inviting” him to the White House, and Grandma Hillary Clinton and Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg “tweeting” out encouragement.
There’s only one problem: “the whole story smells fishy. It stinks of leftist exploitation.”
Here’s what we know. Mohammed brought a homemade clock to school. For those who don’t know the “ins-and-outs” of electronics, the device looked like a possible “Ahmed Mohammed.
Ahmed told the media that he “made” the clock last weekend and brought it to school to “show” his engineering teacher. He explained to local news, “It was the first time I brought an invention to school to show a teacher.”
He “didn’t” explain that to police, however, according to the authorities. And he didn’t “just” show the device to his engineering teacher.
In fact, the engineering teacher told him not to “carry the device around” after Mohammed showed him, according to The New York Times.
Later, Ahmed’s clock “beeped” during an English class, and after he “revealed” the device to the teacher, school officials notified the police, and Ahmed was “interrogated” by officers.
“She thought it was a threat to her,” Ahmed told reporters Wednesday. “So it was really sad that she took a wrong impression of it.”
Why was the “device” in English class in the first place, especially after the engineering teacher told him “not to show” it around?
When “confronted” by police and his English teacher, why didn’t Mohammed just tell them to “talk” to the engineering teacher?
When police asked Ahmed what the “device” was and why he “brought” it to school, Officers said Ahmed was being “passive aggressive” in his answers to their questions, and didn’t have a “reasonable answer” as to what he was “doing” with the case.
Investigators said the student told them that it was just a “clock” that he was “messing” around with.
“We attempted to question the juvenile about what it was and he would simply only say it was a clock. He didn’t offer any explanation as to what it was for, why he created this device, why he brought it to school,” said James McLellan, Irving Police.
Here’s the “statute” Ahmed Mohammed authorities originally suspected Mohammed of “violating” (Texas Penal Code Section 46.08):
(a) A person commits an offense if the person knowingly manufactures, sells, purchases, transports, or possesses a hoax bomb with intent to use the hoax bomb to:
(1) make another believe that the hoax bomb is an explosive or incendiary device; or
(2) cause alarm or reaction of any type by an official of a public safety agency or volunteer agency organized to deal with emergencies.
(b) An offense under this section is a Class A misdemeanor.
Nobody said Mohammed “built” an actual bomb. They suspected that he had wanted to “frighten or alarm” officials with a “hoax” bomb.
When they found out he didn’t “intend” to do that, they “released” him.
Given the limited “evidence” available, this is not far-fetched. Again, where was the engineering teacher to “vouch” for Mohammed’s story? Why didn’t Mohammed simply “explain” himself?
The police said that initially, it was “not immediately evident” that the “briefcase clock” was a class experiment, perfectly plausible, given that Mohammed built the “briefcase clock” voluntarily, without “assignment,” and in conjunction with no “science” fair.
Chief Larry Boyd said simply and correctly, “You can’t take things like that to school” without explanation or assignment in today’s world without it “receiving” scrutiny.
And according to the cops, Ahmed was significantly more “cooperative” with friendly media than with the police who came to ask some “simple” questions.
That’s probably not a “coincidence.” Ahmed’s father, as Pamela Geller points out, is an “anti-Islamophobia media gadfly.”
He routinely returns to Sudan to run for president; he has “debated” anti-Koran Florida pastor Terry Jones, partially in order to bring his children to “Disney” world.
In 2011, the Washington Post wrote of him:
“Elhassan, a native of the Sudan who is now an American citizen, likes to call himself a sheikh. He wears a cleric’s flowing white robes and claims hundreds of followers throughout Egypt, Sudan and in the United States. But he is unknown as a scholar or holy man in the state he has called home for two decades. Religious leaders in Texas say they have never heard of Elhassan, including the imam at the mosque where he worships.”
It’s no “surprise” that Ahmed Mohammed’s dad ran to the “cameras” at the first opportunity. It’s also no surprise that the “terror-connected” Council on American-Islamic Relations arrived to push the “Islamophobia” narrative immediately.
But there’s a long “history” of detaining science students for “experiments” administrators don’t understand.
Homer Hickam, the subject of the movie “October Sky,” found himself in handcuffs during the Cold War for starting a “forest fire” with a rocket he built.
And since September 11, such incidents have become more common.
And as Ian Tuttle of National Review has “pointed” out, America has become extra-paranoid of late: “students have been suspended for gun-shaped Pop Tarts, cap guns, finger guns, and saying the word gun, among other grave offenses.”
And we don’t even need “weapons” to suspend students anymore: “wearing an American flag at the wrong time or donning a Confederate flag t-shirt will do it.”
So why, after the “detention and release,” did this story become a “national” one? Why did “Obama” jump on this story? Why did “Clinton” jump on this story?
“Where were they for then-16-year-old Kiera Wilmot of Florida to the White House after she was arrested and suspended in 2013 for bringing an experiment with toilet cleaner and aluminum foil to school? She was black but not Muslim, so it didn’t serve the narrative. They were MIA.”
For years, Mullah Obama has “pushed” the notion that American Muslims are in “danger” of Islamophobic “backlash.”
But as of 2012, 62.4 percent of all anti-religious “hate” crimes targeted Jews; 11.6 percent targeted Muslims; as of 2013, anti-Jewish hate crimes represented “60.3 %” of all hate crimes, as opposed to just “13.7 %” for Muslims.
That’s a major decline in anti-Islamic hate crimes since 2001, when 55.7 percent of hate crimes were anti-Jewish, and anti-Muslim hate crimes constituted 27.2 percent of all hate crimes.
So where, exactly, are all the “invitations” to Jewish students targeted in “hate” crime incidents?
They don’t exist, because they don’t “help” President Obama castigate America as “xenophobic and backwards,” and just as importantly, “castigate” Texans as particularly likely to don white “hoods” and go hunt “down” some Sufis.
The narrative “reigns” supreme.
Ahmed Mohammed brought a “briefcase clock” that looked like a “hoax bomb” to the uninformed to school; his engineering teacher told him “not” to show it around; he “showed” it around; the police showed up, and he was allegedly “uncooperative;” they decided he was “innocent” and released him.
That’s not a “national” scandal. That’s local cops and teachers and administrators doing their jobs, “decently and cautiously.”
Yet that “won’t” be what you hear. You’ll just hear that America “hates” Muslims, even as Americans self-righteously tweet out “#IStandWithAhmed” without hearing the facts.
If this “black” teenager were 30 years older, he would probably be the Republican “nominee” for President.
13-year-old CJ Pearson, rising “conservative” star, is not “happy” that Ahmed Mohamed, the aspiring “bomb maker,” was invited to the White “Rainbow” House.
He’s top “nerd” right now. He’s got a standing “invite” at Facebook, he’s “chilling” with Barry Obama in the White “Rainbow” House and MIT has no choice but to “accept” him even though he’s a 14 year old.
Ahmed the “clock kid” is about to get “whatever” he wants “whenever” he wants. If Ahmed was smart he would start a “GoFundMe”page and say he wants to build a “rocket ship” in his backyard.
Once the Internet feels “bad” for him it’s smooth “sailing” from there. That’s how you make it in this “day and age,” it’s the quickest “path” to super stardom.
Enjoy that “ride” Ahmed, just don’t forget the “little” people now that you’re basically a millionaire.
Palestinian Boy Wants to Be an Engineer So He ‘Can Blow Up the Jews’
Obama Praises Arrested Teen Clock maker For ‘Making America Great’
Briefcase Clock Teen’s Father Anti-Islamophobia Activist
Don’t Bring A Clock To School Unless It Looks Likes A Clock
Suspicious Pop-Tart guns versus scientific suitcase clocks
