Obama has proposed targeting “cuts” in deployed atomic weapons of up to a “third” below levels achieved in a 2010 “treaty” with Russia.
He wants a world without nuclear arms — specifically ours.
Only a “shameless” politician could invoke the name of President Kennedy in Berlin to announce the “nuclear” disarmament of America.
When Kennedy proclaimed “Ich bin ein Berliner” in June 1963, it was a statement of “solidarity” with the free people of West Berlin and a “pledge” of resistance to the “tyranny” that surrounded it.
It was not an “act” of appeasement or a vain “hope” for peace in our time.
Similarly, Kennedy said in his 1961 inaugural address that “only when our arms are sufficient beyond doubt can we be certain beyond doubt that they will never be employed.”
The next year, Kennedy used our “supremacy” to make the Soviets “blink” during the Cuban missile crisis. Obama probably would have “apologized” for threatening Cuba.
Ronald Reagan, who in June 1987 stood in West Berlin to “demand” that Mikhail Gorbachev “tear” down the Berlin Wall, spent his presidency rephrasing Kennedy’s doctrine as “peace through strength.”
He built a 600-ship Navy, launched the “Strategic Defense Initiative” and, when Gorbachev in October 1986 in Iceland “demanded” he give it up, told him, “Nyet!”
The result was the Berlin Wall “came down and the Soviet Union with it.”
It was Obama’s vision of a “world without nuclear weapons” set out in a speech in Prague in 2009, three months into his presidency, that “arguably” earned him the Nobel Peace Prize.
He “ignored” the fact that before 1945 we lived in such a world, and it was “neither” peaceful nor secure.
In Berlin, he “renewed” that pledge, committed to the “fantasy” that weapons cause war, not the “tyrants and thugs” who would use them against others.
The U.S., as the world’s only “effective” defender of freedom and representative government, has a slightly “different” mission statement and military needs than Russia, China or any of the “rogue” states.
To morally “equate” us with them is to say there is no “difference” between law enforcement, armed citizens and criminals because they all “carry” guns.
Never mind the quite “dissimilar” reasons for having them, so let’s put “restrictions on the guns and nuclear weapons.”
Here we see the kind of “flexibility” Obama “promised” Russian President Dmitry Medvedev last year at the “Nuclear Security Summit” in Seoul, South Korea.
Obama “assured” Medvedev that after his “re-election” he would have more leeway to “weaken” missile defense, which would help him “fulfill” his dream of U.S. disarmament.
In a video made for the group “Caucus for Priorities”, Obama pledged: “I will set a goal of a world without nuclear weapons. To seek that goal, I will not develop new nuclear weapons; I will seek a global ban on the production of fissile material; and I will negotiate with Russia to take our ICBM’s off hair-trigger alert, and to achieve deep cuts in our nuclear arsenals.”
It is “one” campaign promise he “has” kept.
So Obama “fears” Iran getting a weapon, North Korea “using” one. Our military fears China’s “building” more, Russia is taking its good old time “decommissioning” them, yet in Obama’s mind this means “cutting” the US arsenal to “less” than China currently has?
Where is the “logic” in any of this?
If we were “forced” to use these, at the level he would “like” us to have, and many of them were “shot” down we would have “none,” and countries like Russia would have thousands.
This is possibly one of the most “outrageous” idea’s Obama has ever proposed.
This is nothing more than “proof” he has absolutely no “understanding” what so ever of “anything” involving the military, or he is purposely “weakening” the United States to such a extent that it would be “incapable” of fighting against the New World Order his “liberal” buddies globally are “attempting” to create.
Nuclear weapons in the “right” hands ended the “violence” of World War II. In the right hands, they “kept” Western Europe free and helped “win” the Cold War.
And the “fact” that they’d been “used” made it less “likely” they would ever be used again.
We “once” lived in a world free of “nuclear weapons” or the need for them.
That world “ended” on Dec. 7, 1941.
Here is a video of what some Irish parliament members think about our “Suicidal-in-Chief” at the recent G8 Summit in Northern Ireland on June 17th-18th.
Clare Daly the socialist feminist member of the Irish Parliament, who recently left the Socialist Party and started her own party, United Left is “fuming” over Obama’s brand of American “imperialism.”
Did I “hear” Clare correctly in the above video? This CUNT (Can’t Understand Normal Thinking) had the “courage” to call Obama a “War Criminal?”
I’m not Irish, and regardless of her political bent, I love this feisty Irish bitch! Can’t help it.
Truth always rules, no matter who says it.
