The “LGBT Community” can’t even escape the fury that comes with the “incorrect use of gender pronouns.”
Julia Beck, a lesbian activist and former member of the LGBTQ Commission for the mayor of Baltimore, got in a “little trouble” after she called a male rapist “he” when “he” actually considered himself a “transgendered” woman.
During a conservative discussion panel at the Heritage Foundation on Monday, Beck told the story she described as “unbelievable and absurd as it is common place.”
“I got kicked off of the Baltimore mayor’s LGBTQ Commission as the only lesbian, simply for stating biological facts,” she said. “After a months long witch hunt I was found guilty of ‘violence.’ My crime? Using male pronouns to talk about a convicted male rapist who identifies as transgender and prefers female pronouns.”
Beck went on to expose the “foolishness” of the Baltimore LGBTQ commission for their concern of using correct “gender pronouns” as opposed to their concern for a male “rapist” infiltrating a female prison based on how he identifies.
“It doesn’t matter that he sexually assaulted two women in a women’s prison after being transferred there on account of his ‘gender identity,’ she continued. “Oh no, it is far more criminal for me to call a male rapist “he” than it is for him to rape.”
The lesbian activist was brought before the Baltimore Transgender Alliance (BTA) to have her “fitness as a leader” assessed and she describes her experience as “worst than you can imagine.”
The president of the BTA, who is a man that identifies as a woman and a lesbian, accused Beck of “transphobia” and everything went down from there.
“Biological sex was a thing of the past,” she described one man in the meeting as saying.
Her response: “How can we be homosexual, if sex is fake?”
After her experience at the BTA meeting, Beck accused the “T” in LGBTQ of “entirely eclipsing the L, G and B,” with their focus on eclipsing the “L.”
She also spoke out against the “left’s tactics” to include children in this “gender identity crisis.”
Take a listen to her story below:
The real crime here, of course, was the denial of his “chosen gender identity” by the knuckle-dragging, close-minded, reactionary “traitor” to womankind, Julia Beck.
The “delusional” lesbian Julia Beck had mistakenly assumed that being a “sexual minority” entitled her to stating biological facts without clearing them first with the High Commissar of “Pronouns and Dangling Participles.”
A speedy show trial found her guilty of “violent transphobia” and sentenced her to the status of a cis-lesbian non-person with the pronoun “it.”
Beck was tried by the “revolutionary” tribunal at Baltimore Transgender Alliance (BTA), where men with “penises who self-identified as lesbian women” stripped her of her rank as a commanding lesbian activist and demoted her to a lowly “private” dyke.
The verdict stated that “biological sex” was a thing of the past and that anyone who said otherwise was a “Trump-loving Nazi.”
Instead of admitting her guilt, signing a teary confession, and doing hours of public self-criticism, the stubborn self-identified woman took a stand and engaged in despicable acts of “gender terrorism and sedition,” asking questions that threatened the very “foundation of the trans-movement.”
Among other transphobic things she claimed that biological sex was an “immutable” fact, otherwise there would be no
“homosexuality.”
This dramatic development touched on the most “existential” issue of our time:
- If biological sex has no meaning, where do homosexuals come from?
- If gender is a matter of choice, what force causes people to be attracted to the opposite sex, or to the same sex for that matter?
- If sex is arbitrary, what was the fight for same-sex marriage about?
Have homosexuals been doing it “wrong” throughout the millennia, instead of simply “changing their sex” for the common good?
Most importantly, why do homosexuals bitterly “cling” to their biological gender? Is it time to “sacrifice” them to the revolution as “crypto-conservatives and enemies of progress?”
Obviously there are two more crimes and two more criminals in this story. The female inmates who were “raped” are both guilty of “sexual immorality” and should immediately be stoned to death.
It is the only way they can atone for their “criminal” behavior and society be protected from any further criminal behavior. These cis-gendered females were undoubtedly wandering the prison “unveiled,” thereby creating “lust in the penis,” whether it was a male or female penis.
If you want a vision of the future … “imagine a lesbian being denounced for improper usage of a personal pronoun when describing a male convict who is preparing for taxpayer-financed penis removal surgery which will greatly enhance the possibility of his committing suicide, and who raped two women inmates because he was confined in a women’s prison because he claims to be a female bull dyke lesbian and …… I’ve lost my train of “thought” …….
Oh, well.
We must fight this “drooling insanity” of forward thinking.