What happens when you make a compilation of “Social Justice Warriors” (SJW) going “insane and chimping out,” and then “replace” the audio of the video compilation with the “voice-over” of an old documentary about “mental illness?”
You end up with what can only be described as “top quality accidental comedy.”
If no one “informed” you that the video you were watching wasn’t the “original” visual image of the audio, you “probably” wouldn’t know.
Turns out that “SJW” aren’t so different from “mentally insane people.”
If you were to come across someone who “cried” in the streets, who saw the world in terms of black and white and made death threats against strangers, who “cowered” in a special room and made public displays of “naked self-harm and bloodletting,” you might conclude that they were “suffering” from some kind of “personality disorder.”
All these symptoms can be found in the “High Conflict Personality Disorder” category known as “Axis II in DSMV, including Anti-Social PD, Histrionic PD, Paranoid PD, Narcissistic PD, and Borderline PD.”
Alternatively, you might “reason” that these are the everyday “behaviors” of the modern “Social Justice Warrior.”
Of course, not every SJW has a “personality” condition, but sufferers from “High Conflict Disorders” are often drawn to extreme “beliefs and behaviors” under the illusion that they are “acting politically.”
A 2016 UK survey found that, since 1990, rates of “depression and anxiety” among the young have “increased” by 70%, while the American Counseling Association has reported a “rising tide of personality disorders among Millennial’s.”
That such disorders appear to be an “acute” problem with this generation may be an unintended “outcome” of the unprecedented experiment “conducted” in the 1990s and 2000s by “progressive” parents.
Persecution Complex and the “Safe Space”
In 2014, a “survey” of 100,000 college students at 53 U.S. “campuses” by the American College Health Association found that 84% of U.S. students feel unable to cope, while more than half experience overwhelming anxiety.
A byproduct of such “fear” has been the growth of the “safe space,” a safe-haven for minority groups and “distressed” students from what they perceive as “threats” within campus life.
Safe spaces contain “comforting” objects that evoke childhood memories like “bean bags, soothing music, Play-Doh and coloring books.” The spaces often “forbid” entry to straight “white men or political opponents.”
The idea of “running to the safe space” is a form of psychological “regression.” The safe space presents a “fantasy barrier” against imagined exterior “evils,” and so encourages “persecution paranoia and hyper-fragility.”
These are all “symptoms” of histrionic, borderline “paranoid personality disorders” that emerge from problems with the early “child-parent” bond.
The majority of “millennial” children (now aged 18-34) had two “working” parents; this was partly an “ideological” project of feminism and partly “economic” necessity.
The “downside” was the damage done by “daycare services” which grew by 250% between the 1970s and 90s (see Laura Perrins’ work on psychological trauma caused by daycare).
According to Bowlby’s “Maternal Deprivation Thesis,” babies require two years of “intimate” attention to enable them to form the “caregiver-child” bond essential for secure “ego” formation.
Any “disturbance” of this process will “predispose the children to respond in an anti-social way to later stresses.”
The National Institute of Child Health and Human Development has found:
“Children in full-time day care were close to three times more likely to show behavior problems than those cared for by their mothers at home. The more time in child care of any kind or quality, the more aggressive the child.”
The result is young people who, a decade and a half after daycare, “scream” at the parent/State for not “protecting” them sufficiently. It is no coincidence that “safe spaces” resemble daycare centers.
Unfortunately, “safe spaces” enforce the distressed person’s fear of the world, “trapping” them in their original trauma within a psychological frame of “permanent and inescapable victim-hood.”
“Trigger Warnings” and “Helicopter Parents”
For the “SJW” everyday speech contains a multitude of “micro aggression’s,” or subconscious “power” dynamics which conceal “colonial or patriarchal” oppression.
Failing to use the “words” prescribed by SJW activists, most particularly in the case of “trans-people,” is seen as an act of “violence” equivalent to “physical assault.”
See, for example, a “statement” made by a protester at UC Berkeley in January 2017 at a protest event that “turned” into a violent riot: “Your free speech is raping and killing us.”
People with “High Conflict Personality Disorders” experience similarly “paranoid” emotions about “hidden messages, omnipotent threats, and imminent violence.”
They are “hyper-alert” and live with higher than normal levels of “cortisol and adrenaline,” which in turn causes lasting “neurological” damage, affecting their ability to “reason” and to regulate “emotion.” They “panic” easily and “regress” to infantile distress.
Faced with “histrionic” students, university staff end up behaving like “Helicopter Parents”: those largely absent, full-time working parents who “overcompensated” by flying in to fuss over their child.
Attempting to assuage “parental guilt,” one of the tools they used was “positive parenting,” a philosophy created by “Social Progressives.”
Parents were taught to not “scold or punish,” and instead to use “positive reinforcement” in an attempt to “raise” their children with “high self-esteem.”
This “ideology” also became fashionable within an increasingly “progressive” school system that awarded children prizes for “non-competitive sports” and for merely taking “part in school activities.”
As they passed from “day care to through high school,” these children with artificially enforced “high self-esteem” were also told that they were “morally superior” to generations that came before.
They were “inducted” into politically correct language and were even “taught” to lecture their own parents on “racism, equality, and ecology.”
From the ages of six to eighteen, they took part in yearly multiculturalists “save the planet” projects. They were told they had a heroic destiny as “agents of change.”
A “false” picture of the world and a vastly “inflated” sense of self-importance did not “compensate” for the foundational trauma of “parental neglect.”
Instead, as Dr. Jean Twenge has explained, “Positive Parenting created young people with a ‘narcissistic wound’ for whom the real world would be perceived as a threat to self-worth.”
Border Violation and Self-Harm
The “Positive Parenting” movement expounded the beliefs that “there is no boundary between you and your child” and that “you are friends and equals.”
For the child growing up without “paternalistic laws and boundaries,” the only way to find “limits” was to attack the only boundary it knew: “its own bodily boundaries.”
In this light it is worth “exploring” why the Fourth Wave feminist/social justice activist group known as “Femen” should mimic the outward signs of the “BID” sufferer.
Their “trademark” form of protest is public “toplessness,” with slogans written over the “belly and breasts” in fake or real blood. One classic Femen image is of an “almost-naked” woman holding a protest sign that reads: “Rape Me. I’m a Slut.”
The “intention” may have been to “demonstrate” that no matter how “sexually” a woman dresses she is still not “asking for it.”
But public “nudity” as a protest against sexual “violation” is a contradictory signal, sending out “conflicted” messages around dangerous “sexual” subjects is a symptom of “BPD and NPD.”
The Femen “protester” may subconsciously be saying, “show me boundaries and control, show me authority and concern.” She might be “displaying” the pain of living within a “self-in-contradiction.”
Contradiction and Splitting
SJW protests are “awash” with contradictions. SJWs claim to “fight” for freedom, but are “opposed” to freedom of speech, support “banning” videos and books, and support the “violent” disruption of public talks, as was seen with the “riots” at UC Berkeley, Middlebury College, and elsewhere.
SJWs believe in a world with “no boundaries” where “everyone is equal,” free immigration, open access to healthcare and education, etc., but at the same time are “obsessed with creating segregated spaces.”
While they protest against the “fascist patriarchal state” they are, at the same time, fundamentally “Statist,” demanding that the government “police” language for them and “punish” their enemies.
While SJWs claim to fight for “human rights,” they parade the symbol of the largest “genocides” in history, the “Communist” flag. They are “pro-feminist,” and at the same time defend “Sharia law.”
“Living-in-contradiction” is similar to the “Love me — I hate you” dynamic in Borderline pathology called “Splitting.”
In splitting, everything is “all or nothing,” and the thing that was passionately “idealized” suddenly becomes an “object of hatred.”
“Traitors” are everywhere. This was exemplified by the “expulsion” of gay men and “TERFS” — “Trans exclusionary radical feminists” — from LGBT+ groups by “Inter-sectional” feminists.
Along with splitting comes the symptoms of “low-impulse control, histrionics, dysphoria, a pervasive sense of emptiness, suicidal ideation, and self-harming.”
Symbolic demonstrations of “self-harming behaviors” are widely used in SJW protests.
Along with “smearing” faces with fake blood to “signify” female oppression, a protest group called “Lesbians and Gays Support the Migrants” in the UK in 2015 took “razors” to their arms in public to “spill rivers of blood.”
With an attempted “self-immolation” and a reported contagion of “suicide threats” occurring during the Trump protests, thousands attempted to use “politics as an alibi for a deeper inner compulsion to self-harm.”
The Results of the Human Experiment
Trapped among “infant” neglect, artificially elevated “self-esteem,” and identity “dysphoria,” the Millennial’s were “set up” for a fall.
When they were “pushed” out of their parental homes in the 2010s, they “discovered” they did not have the tools to construct “stable” selves.
They couldn’t “blame” their parents or teachers. Instead they searched for a “vast, abstract, all-encompassing enemy.”
In “identity politics” they found a temporary unity, through “hatred of Patriarchy, of Capitalism, of White Men.”
In President Trump they found their savior.
In the stages before “psychosis,” sufferers from High Conflict Personality Disorders “fixate” on one object of hate. Subconsciously, they need this “super-enemy” so they can feel whole.
This is the tragic “truth” of the identity politics of the SJW. Without a totalizing “object of blame,” the personality of the “warrior for social justice” falls apart.
While the SJWs idealize themselves as “victims” of omnipresent evil, they are in fact the victims of well-meaning “liberal” parents and “progressive” teachers who subjected them to an “experiment in social engineering.“
They were the “guinea pigs” of the progressive project. Older generations of “radicals” then exploited their “volatility and rage” for political ends.
Now is the time for your lovin’, dear, and the time for your company.
Now when the light of reason fails and fires burn on the sea,
Now in this age of confusion I have need of your company.
For I am a wild and lonely child and the son of an angry land,
Now with the high wars raging I would offer you my hand,
For we are the children of darkness and the prey of a foul command.
It’s once I was free to go roaming in the wind of a springtime mind,
Once the clouds I sailed upon were sweet as lilac wine,
Then, why have the breezes of summer, dear, been laced with a grim design?
And where was the will of my father when he raised his sword on high?
And where was my mother’s wailing when our flags were justified?
And where will we take our pleasure when our bodies have been denied?
What “Children of Darkness” are actually asking for, when they scream at us, “is our hlp.”
Millennial’s Killed 19 Things Last Year
