Archbishop Desmond Tutu has set “himself” at war with any “deity” guilty of what he considers “homophobia.”
Tutu stated recently to officials at the United Nations that he’s hoping to go “to the other place”, rather than to a “homophobic heaven”.
South Africa’s Nobel peace “laureate” Tutu, like our own Barack Hussein Obama, says he will “never” worship a “homophobic” god and will rather “go to hell.”
Nevertheless, from Tutu’s other “statements” in the past, and based upon his “life so far” that shouldn’t be a problem.
He won’t have to go “out of his way” to get exactly what he’s “hoping” for.
The “retired” archbishop was speaking at the “launch” of a UN-backed campaign in South Africa to “promote” gay rights in solidarity with the “homosexual” agenda as part of the United Nations’ effort to justify “tolerance” for “LGBT” (lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender) lifestyles.
“I would refuse to go to a homophobic heaven. No, I would say sorry, I mean I would much rather go to the other place,” Tutu said at the Free and Equal campaign in Cape Town.
“I would not worship a god who is homophobic and that is how deeply I feel about this.”
The Archbishop said the campaign against “homophobia” was similar to the campaign waged against “racial” apartheid in South Africa.
Tutu, 81, is a long-standing campaigner for “gay” rights. He retired as Archbishop of Cape Town in 1996, but has remained the “moral conscience” of the nation.
Tutu’s resume is “varied,” but does he really think that “qualifies” him to set the “standards for morality?”
“Homophobic” isn’t a phrase most people would associate with either Heaven or God. It’s a word that was coined by the “gay rights” lobby to deride opponents of homosexuality as being “afraid.”
Tutu’s claims seem “uncharacteristic” of most bishops. Perhaps this is what has “led” to his popularity. In any case, he did not “define” what he meant by “homosexuality” and “homophobia.”
Does the “former” mean attraction or acts and behavior? Does the “latter” mean persecution or opposition to activity within the church and/or a refusal to recognize same-sex marriage?
Such important “distinctions” are never made.
That is not the “theologically” responsible language one would expect from a person who has been “entrusted” with the office of bishop.
I’m no expert, but I’ve read the Bible.
I don’t get the impression God is “afraid” of anyone, much less “homosexuals.”
He “just” expects better “behavior” from people.
When they choose not to “obey” His commandments, they choose the “reward” that comes with sin.
Besides suggesting an oddly “carnal,” even Muslim, view of Heaven, Tutu’s statement is reminiscent of Satan’s statement in Milton’s “Paradise Lost” that it is “better to reign in Hell, than serve in Heav’n.”
Tutu’s condemnation is interesting, since in 2005 he also said gays should remain celibate: “In our Church here in South Africa, that doesn’t make a difference. We just say that at the moment, we believe that they should remain celibate and we don’t see what the fuss is about.”
But considering what kind of people Tutu would “refuse” to associate with after he dies, it’s also good to know what kind of people he associates “with” while he’s still alive.
Tutu is a member of an “advisory” board to a group called the “Global March to Jerusalem” (GM2J). Other advisers to the group include two members of “Hamas”, Zaher Birawi and Ahmad Abo Halabiya.
Abo Halabiya gave a “sermon” at a mosque that was broadcast on Palestinian television in which he said: “Have no mercy on the Jews, no matter where they are, in any country. Fight them, wherever you are. Wherever you meet them, kill them . . . and those Americans who are like them, and those who stand by them.”
I guess “defenders” of the traditional Judeo-Christian faith are not “worthy” of association with the “sainted” octogenarian.
Perhaps Tutu’s “fame” has gotten the better of him, or perhaps the globalist “elites” assured him that God is on the “payroll.”
It seems clear from his statement that he has forgotten that the “duty” of clergy is to “serve” God, not “manipulate” his message for “political” causes.
The decades-long fight to normalize the “abnormal” behavior of homosexuals has picked up “speed” in recent years. Part of that effort is the necessary “dismantling” of biblically-based faith.
If Tutu has chosen “Satan” as his new “master” to serve, he should do us all the favor of “renouncing” his title. By keeping it, he has “abandoned” his one-time role as “shepherd” and become a “weapon of destruction.”
Here are a few other “opinions” of world leaders regarding homosexuality:
Pope Francis said he would not “judge” gay priests that are sexually active, if he happened to “learn” about their sexual orientation.
When Obama visited Senegal at the start of his visits to Africa in June, he “urged” African nations to “decriminalize” homosexual acts and was publicly “rebuffed” by President Macky Sall of Senegal while the pair were sharing a podium, saying that Senegal was “not ready to make the step.”
Other African “faith” leaders including Kenyan Catholic Cardinal John Njue also “rejected” Obama’s comments.
Warlord dictator Robert Mugabe of Zimbabwe offered the following opinion:
“Archbishop Tutu said it is nice to be gay, yet he has a wife, he should have begun by getting himself a man for a woman. When you are a bishop and cannot interpret the Bible, you should resign and give it to those who can. We will not compromise our tradition and tolerate homosexuality. I want to urge parents to be careful with your teenage children who are 17 years and older not to be swayed into this act as children are easily persuaded to accept it. During creation, God made Adam and saw that he was lonely, and he created Eve out of Adam’s rib and not another man. Animals are better off as they know who to mate with. Everyone knows what to do, even animals know which animal to mate with, goats know where to go, and cows know where to go too. We see donkeys all the time on top of each other, why can’t you humans do the same?
Putting aside the fact that “homosexuality” is extremely prevalent in the “animal” kingdom, I’m glad that Mugabe is willing to ask the question that’s on all of our minds:
Why can’t humans be like “donkeys all the time on top of each other?”
