Syrian Tourists

President Obama said vacationers are more dangerous than the Syrian refugees that he wants to “secretly” stash in your neighborhood.

“The idea that somehow they pose a more significant threat than all the tourists who pour into the United States every single day just doesn’t jibe with reality,” the president said in Manila.

“So my expectation is after the initial spasm of rhetoric, the people will settle down, take a look at the facts, and we’ll be able to proceed,” he said.

“Spasm of rhetoric”?

Islamic “radicals” have vowed to wage “jihad” in the United States and our Muslim-in-Chief is “ignoring” the threat.

And he thinks those of us who “fear” for the safety of our families are “hysterical” loons?

Is that what Obama told the people of Boston after two Muslim “refugees” blew up the marathon?

Did the people “settle down” after their legs were blown off, Mr. President?

It seems to me that the “prudent” approach is to put Syrian “refugees” on hold. Let our law enforcement and anti-terrorism experts “investigate” the vetting process.

Sen. Jeff Sessions, a Republican from Alabama, issued a “dire” warning for Americans.

“There is simply no way to vet Syrian refugees,” he said.

“There is no database in Syria against which they can run a check. They have no way to enter Syria to verify the applicant’s personal information. And we know the region is being flooded with false documents.”

And yet, Mullah Obama “refuses” to change his mind. He called those who “oppose” his outreach to Syrian Muslims “shameful and UN-American.”

“Visceral disgust” is how the Washington Post described the president’s “attitude.”

He said the Republican Party is “scared of widows and orphans” and he went so far as to suggest that the GOP’s rhetoric is a “recruitment tool” for the Islamic “radicals.”

Several dozen governors “pleaded” with the White “Rainbow” Mosque to place a moratorium on the “admission” of Syrian refugees. But the president “ignored” their concerns.

“They have no choice,” the administration said. They must “accept” the Syrians.

And Obama promised to “veto” any Republican legislation that would improve “screening” measure for Syrian refugees.

Now why would the president “veto” something that would “protect” our families from would be “jihadists” trying to “sneak” into the country?